13-45 Battle Lines Have Been Drawn | Oregon Censorship Lawsuit Filed
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | TuneIn | RSS | More
Show 13-45 Summary: A split show this week. First up, we talk about the battle to get School Choice in Oregon on the November 2024 ballot. There’s been some confusion out there about the funding and how the typical strings-attached could impact home schoolers. Except that is not the case in this case. Find out why. But the bulk of the show is discussing the Oregon censorship lawsuit just filed this week. We bring on the lawyer in the case to discuss why it was brought. And what was so incendiary in Oregon’s “election disinformation” surveillance system. Don’t miss the state’s response to some Republican senators who dared question the state. The war is on.
The I Spy Radio Show airs weekends, six different times, on seven different stations. Listen anywhere through the stations’ live streams! Check out when, where, and how to listen to the I Spy Radio Show. Podcast available Mondays after the show airs on out network of stations.
Original Air Dates: Nov 11th & 12th, 2023 | Guests: Donna Kreitzberg and Stephen Joncus
This Week – In the Trenches
There was a flurry of letters this week as opposing sides squared off over our 1st Amendment rights and, what many feel, is Oregon’s government attack on its own citizens. And from an office no less, that is the supposed to be the defender of Oregonians’ rights—the Secretary of State.
Two weeks ago, we brought you the shocking story of the Secretary of State seeking to hire an AI firm to track, monitor, and report anything the SoS Office deems “mis-, dis-, or mal-information” about the elections. (See Show 13-43, “Oregon’s New Surveillance System to Track, Censor “Election “Disinformation.”) The RFP they posted sought an Orwellian tech company that would surveil social media, websites, blogs, podcasts, and even radio broadcasts.
As we continue to cover this developing fight to protect our rights, there have been some breaking news items as the Secretary of State rightly felt the heat. Among the developments are a new lawsuit filed in federal court, thanks in large part to I Spy listeners’ multiple donations and generosity. A big thank you to all who donated to make this legal defense of our First Amendment possible.
Also, the Republican Senators and Representatives sent a letter to the Secretary of State, admonishing the government’s actions and demanding that they stop. But, not surprisingly, the government effectively responded with “It’s no big deal, we’re just monitoring. And oh by the way we did the same in 2022 and see, no big deal. Plus, other states are doing it too.”
Great way to build trust, Oregon.
This week, we take a look at the legal issues behind this horrible idea.
Questions about School Choice Funding and Regulations
But first up we bring on Donna Kreitzberg to bring us a quick update on the hard work to get school choice on the November 2024 ballot. I Spy Radio has fielded a lot of questions about the funding mechanism for this ballot initiative. Why? Because we have smart listeners. And people know that whenever there is government funding, there are strings attached. So wouldn’t that mean that stay-at-home parents who home school their children will be facing regulations tied to that funding?
The short answer is no. Not in this case.
Because we really dig deep into how Education Freedom for Oregon’s ballot initiative specifically protects against that. It will add an amendment to Oregon’s constitution that protects the choices parents make about their children’s schools.
That constitutional amendment ensures the funding attached to the children does not open the door to government regulations. This is especially true for home schooling — parents choices will be protected and puts a firewall between parents and government regulation. And that will keep government out of the classroom.
Have you signed the school choice ballot initiative petitions? You can download a single-signature petition or a petition with room for ten signatures. Head here to get your petitions and be part of the solution! Be sure to sign both of the ballot initiatives.
Note: there is a third school choice ballot initiative being floated by lobbyists that would not protect parents and home schoolers. In fact, it will almost likely inadvertently open the door to it and even religious based private schools.
Lawsuit to Block Oregon’s Free Speech Surveillance System
Then we welcome Oregon attorney Stephen Joncus, who filed the Oregon censorship lawsuit suing Governor Kotek, Secretary of State Griffen-Valade, and Elections Director, Woon. We discuss the impact the surveillance would have on Oregonians, the destruction of our privacy, and the suit’s request to put a halt to this contract.
Tune in to hear about the Oregon censorship lawsuit, why it was filed, what was so wrong with the State’s RFP for
To nutshell things, the entire problem is the State operates behind closed doors and is doing its best to keep it that way. They sue people who want to look. Or ask for access to public databases. They keep things behind a wall of secrecy, and now they want to block and control communication and discussion about a situation they have kept hidden. And then wonder why people question the integrity of the elections. And will attack anyone who does questions — to paint them with the Yellow Star of “disinformation.”
Read the Oregon censorship lawsuit, Thielman, et al. v. Kotek, the letter from GOP legislators demanding the SoS cease and desist, and the Secretary of State’s response to the legislators about their Orwellian RFP. As we predicted, it’s “Oh, we’re not really stopping free speech.” Sure. Threats don’t have a chilling effect on speech, does it Oregon?
Where are the democrats in all this? U.S. Senator Ron Wyden is against the government monitoring its citizens. So where are other democrats? Unless you speak out against censorship, you’re for it.
And, oh, by the way, it turns out there’s already another surveillance system already in place. That was news to us too. Don’t miss this important show!
The I Spy Radio Show Podcast Version
Trapped under a heavy object? Missed the show? Don’t worry—catch the podcast version. I Spy Radio is now available on your favorite platform, or you can grab it right here. See the full list of podcast options.
Research, Links Mentioned & Additional Info
School Choice Segments
- Ballot Measures for the Nov 2024 (Education for Freedom Oregon)
- “Home schooling’s rise from fringe to fastest-growing form of education.” (Washington Post, Nov 1, 2023)
- The Post examined home schooling’s surge in the U.S. Here’s what we found. (Washington Post, via MSN.com, Oct 31, 2023)
Oregon Censorship Lawsuit Segments
- Read for yourself: *Oregon censorship lawsuit, Thielman, et al. v. Kotek
- Letter from GOP legislators demanding the SoS cease and desist its attack on Oregonians’ free speech
- The Secretary of State’s response to the legislators defending their Orwellian RFP. Do disinformation much, Oregon?
- Oregon’s other, already existing, surveillance system: TITAN. The two lawsuits mentioned:
- Farrell-Smith et al. v. Oregon DOJ (Dec 14, 2021)
- Farrell-Smith et al. and Rogue Climate (Intervenor) v. Oregon DOJ, (April 27, 2023)
- US Lawmakers Propose Bill to Curtail FBI’s Warrantless Spy Powers (Epoch Times, Nov 7, 2023)
- Profile of Marco A. Hernandez, the judge in the Oregon censorship lawsuit case. First appointed by George W, and then later re-appointed by Obama. In March 2023, he announced he would retire on August 21, 2024 (via Ballotpedia, updated March 2023)
- Senate unanimously approves Marco Hernandez to be federal judge (OregonLive, Feb 7, 2011)
One Reply to “13-45 Battle Lines Have Been Drawn | Oregon Censorship Lawsuit Filed”